Zero Dependencies, 250KB, 486 Tests: What I Learned Building an MCP Client

Zero Dependencies, 250KB, 486 Tests: What I Learned Building an MCP Client This is not a product pitch. It's an engineering diary. If you want the pitch, the README is here. This is about the cost of zero. The setup Six weeks ago I started building mcptoon — a CLI tool that sits between AI agents (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) and MCP servers. The problem it solves: MCP tool schemas get injected into your context window as JSON. 255 tools = ~91K tokens of JSON braces, brackets, quotes, and commas — before any actual work happens. mcptoon keeps schemas out of context. The agent runs shell commands. Only the compact result enters context. But none of that is what I want to talk about. I want to talk about the decision that shaped everything: zero dependencies. # pyproject.toml dependencies = [] Not "minimal dependencies." Not "few dependencies." Zero. Why zero? The trigger was the uv security incident. A transitive dependency in a popular Python tool had a supply chain vulnerability. Thousands of projects were affected. Not because they did anything wrong — because someone upstream did something wrong. I looked at my own pip install history. How many packages had I installed in the last year? Hundreds. Each one pulling in its own dependency tree. How many of those dependencies had I audited? Zero. So when I started mcptoon, I made a rule: no third-party imports. Python standard library only. This sounded reasonable in theory. In practice, it meant I was about to hand-roll a lot of things. The cost: What I had to build myself No requests → hand-write an HTTP client The standard library has http.client and urllib. They work. But they're verbose. Here's what a POST request looks like with urllib: import json, urllib.request def http_post(url, data, headers=None): body = json.dumps(data).encode("utf-8") req = urllib.request.Request( url, data=body, headers={"Content-Type": "application/json", **(headers or {})} ) with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=30) as resp: return json.loads(resp.read().decode("utf-8")) That's 8 lines. With requests, it would be 1: import requests resp = requests.post(url, json=data, headers=headers, timeout=30) Cost: ~200 lines of HTTP plumbing (streaming SSE, error handling, retry logic, auth). With requests, maybe 30 lines. Was it worth it? For SSE (Server-Sent Events) parsing — yes, I learned how the protocol actually works. For basic HTTP — no, it was just plumbing. No click or argparse extensions → hand-write CLI parsing Python's stdlib argparse is... fine. But click is so much nicer. Decorators, subcommands, context, help text generation. With argparse, I ended up with a 400-line CLI dispatch function: def main(): parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(prog="mcptoon") sub = parser.add_subparsers(dest="command") # ... 15 subcommands, each with its own args ... add_cmd = sub.add_parser("add") add_cmd.add_argument("name") add_cmd.add_argument("--stdio", nargs="+") add_cmd.add_argument("--url") # ... etc for every command Cost: ~400 lines of argument parsing. With click, maybe 150 lines. No pydantic → hand-write validation MCP servers return JSON. Without pydantic, every response is a dict and you validate by hand: def validate_tool_result(result): if not isinstance(result, dict): raise ValueError("Expected dict") if "content" not in result: raise ValueError("Missing 'content'") for item in result["content"]: if "type" not in item: raise ValueError("Each content item needs 'type'") if item["type"] == "text" and "text" not in item: raise ValueError("text content missing 'text' field") Cost: ~300 lines of validation across the codebase. With pydantic, models would self-validate. No rich → hand-write terminal formatting This one actually surprised me. I didn't need rich. ANSI escape codes work fine: def bold(text): return f"\033[1m{text}\033[0m" def green(text): return f"\033[32m{text}\033[0m" def dim(text): return f"\033[2m{text}\033[0m" Cost: ~50 lines. Not bad. No pytest plugins → plain unittest-style tests Actually, I do use pytest as a dev dependency (in [project.optional-dependencies]). But no pytest-mock, no pytest-cov, no responses, no httpx for mocking. Just unittest.mock: from unittest.mock import patch, MagicMock @patch("mcptoon.client.MCPClient._stdio_request") def test_call_tool(mock_request): mock_request.return_value = {"result": {"content": [{"type": "text", "text": "hello"}]}} client = MCPClient(stdio=["echo", "test"]) result = client.call_tool("search", {"q": "test"}) assert result["content"][0]["text"] == "hello" Cost: More verbose test setup. But 486 tests still run in 0.5 seconds because there are no heavy fixtures. The payoff: What zero dependencies bought me 1. Install size: 250KB $ pip install mcptoon # Downloaded 250KB. Installed in 0.3s. For comparison, a typical MCP client with requests, pydantic, click, rich: requests + its deps: ~5MB pydantic + its deps: ~15MB click: ~200KB rich: ~5MB Total: ~25MB mcptoon is 1% of that. 2. Security audit surface: zero $ pip audit mcptoon # No vulnerabilities found. # (Because there's nothing to audit beyond stdlib.) When the next supply chain attack hits npm or PyPI, mcptoon users are unaffected. Not because I was clever — because there's nothing to attack. 3. Cross-platform: actually works on Windows Most Python CLI tools are developed on macOS/Linux and "should work on Windows." With zero dependencies, there are no platform-specific binary wheels to worry about. No uvloop that doesn't support Windows. No uvicorn worker model differences. Just sys.platform checks for .cmd vs binary names: def _resolve_cmd(cmd): if sys.platform == "win32" and not cmd[0].endswith(".cmd"): if shutil.which(cmd[0] + ".cmd"): cmd = [cmd[0] + ".cmd"] + cmd[1:] return cmd mcptoon works on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Not "should work" — "tested on all three." 4. Install speed $ time pip install mcptoon # real 0m0.3s $ time pip install # real 0m12.4s When your CI runs 1000 times a day, 12 seconds per install adds up. 5. Trust When someone reads your source and sees import json, subprocess, urllib.request, argparse — they understand it. There's no import magical_toolkit that does something opaque. The entire codebase is readable by anyone who knows Python. This matters for adoption. Developers who care about security (and MCP users tend to) can audit your code in an afternoon. They don't need to audit 30 transitive dependencies. When zero dependencies is NOT worth it I'm not going to pretend zero dependencies is always the right choice. Here's when it hurts: When you're building a web app. You need a router, a template engine, a database ORM, session management. Hand-writing all of these is insane. Use Django, FastAPI, Flask. When the problem is already solved well. json parsing? Use stdlib. HTTP/2? Use httpx or h2 — the protocol is complex enough that a hand-rolled implementation will have bugs. When your team is larger than one. Zero dependencies means everyone needs to understand the entire stack. With libraries, you can treat them as black boxes. That scales better with team size. When you need to move fast. Zero dependencies means writing more code. More code means more bugs. If you're racing to market, use libraries. For mcptoon, it was the right choice because: It's a CLI tool, not a web app — scope is bounded The core problem (JSON encoding/decoding, HTTP, subprocess) is well-defined It's security-sensitive — it handles credentials and tool results Small enough for one person to maintain The zero-dependency story IS the marketing — it's not just engineering, it's product The unexpected lesson: Zero dependencies made me a better programmer This is going to sound like a motivational poster. Bear with me. When you use requests.post(), you don't think about: What HTTP version is being used How redirects are followed What happens when the connection drops mid-response How SSL verification works When you hand-write HTTP, you have to understand all of it. When you use pydantic, you don't think about: What happens when a field is None vs missing How nested validation works What the error messages look like for users When you hand-write validation, you own all of it. When you use click, you don't think about: How subcommands are dispatched How help text is generated How arguments are parsed from sys.argv When you hand-write CLI parsing, you understand your own interface. I'm not saying you should never use libraries. I'm saying: if you've never built something with zero dependencies, you should try it at least once. The things you learn about the tools you use every day are worth the extra code. The numbers After six weeks of zero-dependency development: Metric Value Source size ~250KB Lines of code ~6,400 Tests 486 Test runtime 0.5s Dependencies 0 Install time 0.3s GitHub stars 177 PyPI versions 8 (v0.1.0 → v0.5.1) Security vulnerabilities 0 The most surprising number is the test runtime. 486 tests in 0.5 seconds. No fixtures to load, no mocking frameworks to initialize, no database to set up. Just pure Python functions. I can run the entire test suite before my terminal even finishes rendering the prompt. What's next mcptoon v0.5.1 just shipped with mcptoon serve (stdio bridge mode) and mcptoon demo (zero-config one-command experience). The project is at 177 stars and growing. The zero-dependency rule stays. It's not just an engineering decision — it's a promise to users: when you install this tool, you get exactly what you see. No hidden code. No transitive surprises. No supply chain. If that resonates with you: pip install mcptoon Or read the source. It's 250KB. You can audit it in an afternoon. This is an independent project. Not affiliated with Anthropic. Apache 2.0 licensed. If you found it useful, a GitHub star helps others find it.